Leopold
New Member
Hi there, I'm Leopold!
Posts: 17
|
Post by Leopold on Dec 17, 2015 4:52:48 GMT
You will not be able to acquire true sovereignty - that's the fact of the matter. You may, however, exist as an ad-hoc national entity within private property of a state or national government.
|
|
|
Post by britbong on Dec 17, 2015 5:15:30 GMT
You will not be able to acquire true sovereignty - that's the fact of the matter. You may, however, exist as an ad-hoc national entity within private property of a state or national government. It's not a matter of fact. It's what our goal is. Otherwise we might as well build cucksheds. If we made a permanent settlement in the unclaimed section of Antarctica we could probably get a nation, free and independent. Once we have an inch we'll take a mile.
|
|
Leopold
New Member
Hi there, I'm Leopold!
Posts: 17
|
Post by Leopold on Dec 17, 2015 5:24:54 GMT
Think about the logistics of an Antarctic nation though. You're likely to all simply die if you try that.
|
|
|
Post by britbong on Dec 17, 2015 5:39:37 GMT
Think about the logistics of an Antarctic nation though. You're likely to all simply die if you try that. It's very cold but not impossible to survive there. Main problem is food - little and less grows. Fishing in good and well but not enough to live on. This is why when I first bought it up we were talking about man-made islands (or large boats) which we could live and grow food on. The Antarctic clay is just for nation status.
|
|
Leopold
New Member
Hi there, I'm Leopold!
Posts: 17
|
Post by Leopold on Dec 17, 2015 5:44:20 GMT
Electricity and income do not go hand-in-hand with a barren region and man-made islands.
|
|
vendetta92
New Member
Louisiana 23 year old male tired of all these normies and niggers
Posts: 13
|
Post by vendetta92 on Dec 17, 2015 7:44:50 GMT
I would highly suggest take a part of Canada and declare sovereignty, their military is a joke compared to US. The main problem here is getting people from different parts of the world together to get this moving.
|
|
|
Post by germanwriter on Dec 17, 2015 7:57:34 GMT
I would highly suggest take a part of Canada and declare sovereignty, their military is a joke compared to US. The main problem here is getting people from different parts of the world together to get this moving. yeah isnt easy without help. like isis got from the US. only months and boom own state with bilion $ capital. idk how long it would take the oldschool way.
|
|
|
Post by britbong on Dec 17, 2015 8:12:17 GMT
I would highly suggest take a part of Canada and declare sovereignty, their military is a joke compared to US. The main problem here is getting people from different parts of the world together to get this moving. DUDE WEED LMAO wouldn't be anything about it but Canada is under the protection of her majesty.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 17, 2015 8:35:32 GMT
I'm against accepting any religious belief on this. If anything, Jews and Muslims are the top two we want to avoid, but I'd rather go for an official agnostic position.
If we are here to create a state/colony/island based on rationalism and knowledge, agnosticism is the logical answer.
Simply put : we do not have the means to know whether or not God exist, this question can't be adressed, at least not until our specy explore space or somehow "control" death. And it will certainly be a while until we know for sure, if we ever do.
Religious stands are a waste of time.
|
|
vendetta92
New Member
Louisiana 23 year old male tired of all these normies and niggers
Posts: 13
|
Post by vendetta92 on Dec 17, 2015 8:51:40 GMT
So what you're saying is we can't have a society based on worshiping Adolf Hitler or the God Emperor of Mankind? because those are the only 2 options for a 'state' religion in my opinion otherwise just ban judaism/islam and have the only acceptable religious practices as christian based or agnostic based religions.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 17, 2015 8:56:54 GMT
I'm stating my opinion, and yes that would include those two cults. They lead to delusion and waste our time and efforts on false trails.
You could argue that worshiping some theoretical superior being is a WY to motivate people on the long term, but this worship, as far as we know, could very well be based on a lie. We should worship our project of society instead, not some mystical figure.
|
|
vendetta92
New Member
Louisiana 23 year old male tired of all these normies and niggers
Posts: 13
|
Post by vendetta92 on Dec 17, 2015 9:02:08 GMT
That's acceptable as long as like i said earlier only allowing christian or agnostic based religions.
|
|
|
Post by redsage on Dec 17, 2015 18:30:24 GMT
Nope. No non-whites. If we allow people of other races into our nation, that only risks falling into the same boat America did. It wont be a problem until much later when after a few years, he rules will get more and more lenient, our society will become degenerate and the very thing we are trying to escape. To be successful, this needs to be STRICT and without risk of compromise.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2015 18:35:27 GMT
Nope. No non-whites. If we allow people of other races into our nation, that only risks falling into the same boat America did. It wont be a problem until much later when after a few years, he rules will get more and more lenient, our society will become degenerate and the very thing we are trying to escape. To be successful, this needs to be STRICT and without risk of compromise. It's not about being white, it's about being a decent, useful human being.
|
|
Leopold
New Member
Hi there, I'm Leopold!
Posts: 17
|
Post by Leopold on Dec 17, 2015 19:01:42 GMT
I agree with redsage - no non-whites. Doesn't matter if they're these theoretically, 'good people,' when the fact of the matter is that they're still not white or ideal.
|
|