|
|
Post by therusmasterofpol on Dec 17, 2015 15:37:20 GMT
City name poll:
goo.gl/in6lbyMy paste from 4chan:
You can build the future, free from cultural marxism. How it should be done: - [?] - Establish the free fleet.
- [0] - At first, we start as ecological institute\organisation\or some corporation. We take some funding from seasteading institutes, various ecological and research organisations.
- [1] - Our first hive should be in ocean, therefore, we need floating structures (we should buy old oil rig or something)
- [2] - We need free stuff to create something. How can we get it? One man's trash is another man's treasure. Literally. We will recycle the waste from rich countries (and they will pay for it). It will provide us glass, metal, electrical and electronical equipment, plastic and organic waste. btw, no one should be forced to do it manually - so, robots, automatisation and computers should take care about it.
- [3] - But we need not only these materials. We also need energy, water, food, fuel. At first, we will use wind turbines (for electricity) and solar thermal power plant (for electricity, water and chemicals, heat). At second, we can load organic waste into bioreactors to get heat, chemicals, fertilizers and methane (fuel and raw material), which after could be burned in gas turbines (electricity and heat). As for food there would be aquaponics, hydroponics and aquaculture. Also floating farms (minipigs, minicows, birds, rabbits, goats, sheeps and some furry) and gardens (fruits, vegetables, herbals). It's all also sources for our medical station.
- [4] - We need more money, of course. For that, go back to [2]. Everything valuable, which can be repaired - should be repaired and sold. Things, which can't be repaired - should be disassembled into valuable components and materials. It's all can be sold to Africa\Asia\South America. Also, it can be sold to hipsters, ecofags and poorfags in wealthy countries.
- [5] - We need even more money. Therefore, we go further in recycling - we will make something like planes\helicopters\ships\cars graveyard. The logic is same as in [4]. We can't use cars in ocean, but they're still nice source of materials.
- [6] - Okay, if we made it all - we're pretty big4u colony. We should increase the territory - create\buy the new platform or make artifical island for establishing of state.
- [7] - Now, we're all into everything. You have a promising start up? Come here, m8, we have resources and specialists. You have a great web idea? Sure, lad, our data center will take care of it. Wanna new VPN? Hosting in our territory, whice have no copyright laws and shit? No problem. But we don't forget about our old business - wanna really cheap and powerful server? Maybe %%our brand production%% (of course we will establish our own brands - we have everything for manufacture)? Maybe generic medicine? Or UAV? Or repaired and improved ship\plane\helicopter? Maybe you wanna taste wine made from grape, that grow in ocean? Or very rare and unique wine made from grape, which grow in underwater basket?
- [8] - Army and transportation - no draft in peace time. Some boots for close contacts, navy and airforce from [5]. But mostly, our defence forces are UAVs\USVs. As for transport - repaired and improved from [5], blimps, baloons.
- [9] - Establishing the state and new city-ctates around the world.
>Where exacly should we go?
Well, let's take a look. We need internet and trade routes.   And somewhere in free ocean, in international waters.  And don't forget about hurricanes. 
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2015 16:30:06 GMT
Use Strawpoll.
|
|
|
|
Post by pingudiagram on Dec 17, 2015 22:30:36 GMT
Addressing air capabilities: Probably not an immediate need, but will be useful for self defense. I feel like the difficulty wouldn't be obtaining them but rather keeping them well armed and in good condition, so we can use the map to see which places are safest. Also a less windy place will make for a less chance for accidents. Due to being on an island it is best to find aircraft with a short takeoff run (or none at all). Or even SAMs can really reduce our needs too. Basic stuff: FIM-92 Stinger (or comprable MANPADS)? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIM-92_StingerRQ-11 Raven (or comparable MUAV): we can use this for more than just military like search and rescue and monitoring wildlife? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AeroVironment_RQ-11_RavenLater we could aim for old surplus planes and helicopters A-37 Super Tweet (or comparable armed trainer jet): nice little agile plane that can carry its own weight in armament, could see if we could add avionics and modern munitions like GBU-38s, GBU-39s, CBU-97 with BLU-108s, AGM-176, APKWS Hydra 70s, and etc.? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cessna_A-37_DragonflyAH-6 Little Bird (or comparable light helicopter)? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MD_Helicopters_MH-6_Little_BirdAddressing energy: We could get see if we could help dispose of nuclear waste from other nations and profit from that and reuse it in RTGs, although seems like an incredibly stupid idea (we could use Sr-90 and Am-241) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioisotope_thermoelectric_generator |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 17, 2015 22:43:35 GMT
Yeah.. nah.
I mean. This is supposed to be a small society that would go rather unnoticed by anyone else and be quite remote so I don't really think heavy weapons would be needed. Plus they're expensive as shit.
As for the nuclear waste thing. This kind of shit is heavily regulated andB would draw unnecessary attention on us, with suspicion of terrorism and all.
|
|
buu
New Member
Posts: 8 
|
Post by buu on Dec 18, 2015 0:20:40 GMT
I believe the only way this city can be taken seriously is if we rely heavily on tourism. Make weed legal let it grow and we harvest on the tourism. Or something else just helping
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2015 0:24:48 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by britbong on Dec 18, 2015 2:54:36 GMT
We should put more thought in our city/colony name. Perhaps find a word of phrase appropriate for our situation in any ancient language and bastardise it into a name.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2015 3:04:20 GMT
We should put more thought in our city/colony name. Perhaps find a word of phrase appropriate for our situation in any ancient language and bastardise it into a name. It'll always be nicknamed "The Polony", that's for sure. I'd name it /pol/and, but that's already a thing. |
|
|
|
Post by paulblart on Dec 19, 2015 13:08:59 GMT
the henderson island idea is a bit ambitious, and possibly not the best choice. It is owned by the pitcairn islanders and technically it is protected. it also has a tropical climate and would be hard to get to. it is very isolated but the world heritage protection would be hard to get past. also see picture:  i would maybe suggest an uninhabited island in the greek archipelago, particularly en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyra_Panagia the only drawback would be the monk living on it, what do? but its a much better choice than henderson island, which also has quite a few earthquakes so. kyra panagia is definitely near a trade route, no tropical storms. the land is also fertile, lots of trees and nice terrain. what do we think? also better climate imo  Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by therusmasterofpol on Dec 19, 2015 13:56:06 GMT
the henderson island idea is a bit ambitious, and possibly not the best choice. It is owned by the pitcairn islanders and technically it is protected. it also has a tropical climate and would be hard to get to. it is very isolated but the world heritage protection would be hard to get past. also see picture: i would maybe suggest an uninhabited island in the greek archipelago, particularly en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyra_Panagia the only drawback would be the monk living on it, what do? but its a much better choice than henderson island, which also has quite a few earthquakes so. kyra panagia is definitely near a trade route, no tropical storms. the land is also fertile, lots of trees and nice terrain. what do we think? also better climate imo It's owned by Greece. Also, "refugees". |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2015 16:57:33 GMT
the henderson island idea is a bit ambitious, and possibly not the best choice. It is owned by the pitcairn islanders and technically it is protected. it also has a tropical climate and would be hard to get to. it is very isolated but the world heritage protection would be hard to get past. also see picture: i would maybe suggest an uninhabited island in the greek archipelago, particularly en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyra_Panagia the only drawback would be the monk living on it, what do? but its a much better choice than henderson island, which also has quite a few earthquakes so. kyra panagia is definitely near a trade route, no tropical storms. the land is also fertile, lots of trees and nice terrain. what do we think? also better climate imo More likely to trigger a military response than my Henderson plan. |
|
|
|
Post by chipsandhaterade on Dec 19, 2015 22:13:44 GMT
Guys are looking in the wrong ocean lol
Go Pacific.
|
|
|
|
Post by britbong on Dec 19, 2015 22:37:09 GMT
Hell this is the wrong thread
We have one going in one of the sub boards
|
|
|
|
Post by niggerkiller911 on Dec 24, 2015 16:55:51 GMT
I believe the only way this city can be taken seriously is if we rely heavily on tourism. Make weed legal let it grow and we harvest on the tourism. Or something else just helping Weed is degenerate though, it encourages laziness, which if we are going to have to be maintaining a city is the last thing we want. Open to tourists is a good idea though, but we can't have workers smoking weed |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 24, 2015 16:57:57 GMT
Legal harvest and importation, ban use.
|
|
